Save this discount code: And there is no surprise in that, considering the tragic events that took place recently. The discussion around gun control has been lasting for as long as this country exists, but it has become an even more pressing issue after those mass shootings. It is being discussed everywhere — in the media, in the scientific journals on social studies, in the city councils and in the Congress.
This column was co-authored by Eve Stieglitz In the aftermath of the second and third worst Islamic terrorist attacks upon America sincethe socialist left, enabled by the mainstream media, has manufactured a false narrative of individual gun control being the issue. House of Representatives chamber.
However, there is a real issue of gun and weapons control in the Obama administration that the progressive left does not want to mention, certainly not address. During the tenure of the Obama administration there have been several instances of guns supplied through programs of this executive branch having a deadly result for American citizens.
I speak of the Obama Department of Justice program that flooded weapons into Mexico -- with the true intention of indicting the gun dealerships in America -- under the purview of then Attorney General Eric Holder.
Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, one of these weapons was used in his murder. Where is the accountability for that action? And, please, spare us the Bush Derangement Syndrome, saying that this was his program. Operation Fast and Furious was an Obama administration program that failed to have requisite controls in place to track the weapons part of the gun sales.
And, we must mention that there were Mexican citizens who also lost their lives due to this very flawed Fast and Furious program.
Here again, we must ask, where are the gun control measures to ensure these weapons do not end up in the wrong hands? And, of course, will there be anyone held accountable in the deaths of these two Americans, gunned down while training security personnel?
When one does an objective analysis of the jihadist attack against the Special Mission Compound and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, September 11,you must ask, could the weapons used to kill four Americans that fateful night have been supplied by the Obama administration?
After all, we did outsource our military fighter aircraft and intelligence to Islamic jihadist groups in Libya -- as well as supply them with weapons.
Funny, we flew combat missions to support jihadists but somehow the Obama administration, along with then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, could not scramble one fighter aircraft, or armed drone, to support Americans being besieged. We all know that there was a weapons buy-back program being executed by the Obama administration in Libya.
Many assess it was to funnel these weapons to jihadi fighters in Syria. Of course, we know that countless weapons provided to the Iraqi Army have ended up in the hands of the Islamic State. Perhaps the Obama administration and his willing acolytes on Capitol Hill and in the media should address this clear and present danger of gun control and leave the constitutional right of Americans alone?
Here is a recommendation: There have been discussions about smart gun technology. Now, as law abiding legal American gun owners, is it necessary to mandate to us the means by which our firearms should be outfitted for security? The answer should be a declarative no -- that is an infringement.
We have just witnessed the State of Hawaii supplying the names of lawful gun owners to be entered into an FBI database. That is not gun control; that is borderline Stalinism, and a violation of the second, fourth, and fifth amendments of our Bill of Rights.
So, here is where the attention should be focused: Why not use the smart gun technology as a means to track and disable weapons that have fallen into the hands of the enemy?
The point is clear. Under the Obama administration we have a gun control issue and there is a serious problem with proliferation of arms paid for by the American taxpayer ending up in the hands of those who are killing Americans.
One could even go so far as questioning violation of U.
Aiding and abetting their efforts is serious. That could represent a very clear criminal action, with definitive consequences and ramifications. That aside, the recommendation is that we fix this issue going forward.
There is an obvious need, so there is need for an obvious solution. We need to end the insidious ideological false narrative of focusing on gun control for legal American gun owners.
We must end the ability of weapons that end up in the hands of the enemy. Chris Reeves Sinceover NATO soldiers were killed by Afghan security forces who intentionally turned their weapons against coalition forces.Oct 07, · Gun Control Explained is not the time to debate the issue.
Opponents of gun control often talk about President Obama wanting to take guns . Gun control is an issue that has been debated by Americans since the ’s (Dolan 1). The debate questions the right of Americans to bear arms, this including, handguns, shotguns, and rifles.
Jul 23, · Kavanaugh Could Tip Supreme Court Against Gun Control Laws If constitutionally permissible gun control," says UCLA law professor Adam . There is an obvious need, so there is need for an obvious solution. We need to end the insidious ideological false narrative of focusing on gun control for legal American gun owners.
CRITIQUE: The report skips by the most obvious issue, which is that most New York State crime guns come from New York. According to the BATF “Firearms Recovered and Traced” report, New York was the source for 31% of all its crime guns, despite having very stringent gun control laws.
Being well-informed about the gun control debate is crucial for writing an excellent gun control essay, but it is still only half the battle.
You still need to know what kind of essay you have to submit and what your teacher expects of you. Here are the kinds of gun control essays that you may have to write: Argumentative gun control essay.
In an argumentative essay, you convince your reader logically that .